Universal Registration Document - Fiscal 2023

2. Corporate responsibility at Sodexo

  • We referred to documentary sources and conducted interviews to:
    • assess the process used to identify and confirm the main risks as well as the consistency of the outcomes, including the key performance indicators used, with respect to the main risks and the policies presented,
    • corroborate the qualitative information (measures and outcomes) that we considered to be the most important presented in the Appendices. Concerning certain risks(3) , our work was carried out on the consolidating entity, for the other risks, our work was carried out on the consolidating entity and on a selection of entities(4) ;
  • We verified that the Statement covers the consolidated scope, i.e. all the entities within the consolidation scope in accordance with Article L. 233-16 of the French Commercial Code, within the limitations set out in the Statement;
  • We obtained an understanding of internal control and risk management procedures the entity implemented, and assessed the data collection process aimed at ensuring the completeness and fairness of the Information;
  • For the key performance indicators and other quantitative outcomes that we considered to be the most important, presented in the Appendices, we implemented:
    • analytical procedures to verify the proper consolidation of the data collected and the consistency of any changes in those data,
    • tests of details, using sampling techniques, in order to verify the proper application of definitions and procedures and reconcile the data with supporting documents. This work was carried out on a selection of contributing entities(4) and covers between 20% and 100% of the consolidated data relating to the key performance indicators and outcomes selected for these tests;
  • We assessed the overall consistency of the Statement based on our knowledge of all the consolidated entities' activities.

The procedures performed in a limited assurance review are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance opinion in accordance with the professional guidance of the French Institute of Statutory Auditors (Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes) , a higher level of assurance would have required us to carry out more extensive procedures.

Nature and extent of additional work on the information selected by the entity and identified by the sign √

With regard to the information selected by the entity, presented in the Appendices and identified by the symbol √ in the Statement, we conducted the same work as described in the paragraph “Nature and scope of our work” above for the Information considered to be the most important, but in a more in-depth manner, in particular with regard to the number of tests.

The selected sample accounts for between 59% and 100% of the information identified by the symbol √.

We believe that our work is sufficient to provide a basis for our reasonable assurance opinion on the information selected by the entity and identified by the symbol √.

Paris la Défense, on October 26th 2023

KPMG S.A.

Caroline Bruno Diaz

Partner

Fanny Houlliot

ESG Expert

(3) Employee social dialogue, Food waste, Packaging and plastics, Respect of human and workers’ rights in the supply chain, Safety and quality of food and FM (Facilities Management) services, Access to affordable and healthy food, Data privacy and protection, Fight against tax evasion.

(4) Entities that were selected for limited assurance: OSS United States of America and OSS France. Entities that were selected for reasonable assurance:

- Sodexo On-Site Services: Brazil, Chili, India

- Sodexo Benefits & Rewards Services: France